Attachment to Independent Case Review Report
For CDRU # 5866 Case file # 95-230469,
Material Examiner: Malone fRO)
Remarks:
Case resulted in a guilty plea, no testimony transcript.
CRM - 7867
INDEPENDENT CASE REVIEW REPORT
Independent Review conducted by: . Steve Robertson
Area(s) of Expertise: Hair and Fiber
Review commenced at: 10:15 AM (Time), 10/23/02 (Date)
File#: 95-230469
Laboratoiy #(s): 90424020
Examiner(s) & Symbols
Reviewed
Not Reviewed
Reviewed
Not Reviewed
X
a
□
o
D
□
□
□
D
□
□
□
Materials Reviewed
Trial testimony transcripts) of: Not available,, guilty plea
Testimony Date(s): Pages:
Laboratoiy Report(s):
I
Laboratoiy Number: 90424020 Date: Aug. 2, 1979
Laboratoiy Number Date:
Laboratoiy Number Date:
Examiner Bench Notes of: RQ
Laboratoiy Number: 90424020
Page
of
CRM - 7868
Irtifiole'
^ 7 ///
Was any other material reviewed? X Yes □ No
If yes, please identify and/or describe the material: submitting agency letter dated April 13, 1979
Results of Review
File#: 95-230469
Item or Specimen # Reviewed: Q1-Q7, K1-K5
Review ofLaboratory Report(s) and Bench Notes:
1)
2 )
Note: Numbered comments are required below or on
additional pages for any "No" or "Unable to Determine" Responses
Did the examiner perform the appropriate tests in a scientifically acceptable manner, based on the
methods, protocols, and analytic techniques available at the time of the original examination^)?
□ Yes oNo X Unable to Determine
Are the examination results set forth in the laboratoiy report(s) supported and adequately documented in
the bench notes? nYes XNo □ Unable to Determine
Review of Testimony:
Note: Numbered comments are required below or on
additional pages for any "No" or "Unable to Determine" Responses
X Transcript not available.
*
k
3) Testimony consistent with the laboratoiy report(s)?
a Yes
□ No
□ Unable to Determine
4) Testimony consistent with the bench notes?
o Yes
□ No
□ Unable to Determine
5) _ Testimony within bounds of examinees expertise?
a Yes
□ No
n Unable to Determine
Page
2 of 3
Initials;
V •? . »A • • S' * .
" * * : »•*• * * ~ 'v<->
0
Comments
(Set forth by above question #, if applicable. .
Use "Additional Comments" Sheet, if needed)
File#: 95-230469
#1. It cannot be determined from the notes if the tests were performed in a scientifically acceptable manner.
#2. The results are not adequately documented in the notes. The notes are not dated, are in pencil. instead of ink
and use abbreviations difficult to interpret
Review completed at:
10:30 AM (Time), , 10/23/02
(Date)
Total time spent conducting review (to nearest 1/4 hour):
0.25 hrs.
I hereby certify that I conducted this review in an independent, unbiased manner and that the results of my review
are fully documented on this report consisting of a total of 3 pages.
mi,.
(Signature)
Oct 23, 2002